Kenneth Burke’s Screen Theory
Kenneth Burke’s Screen Theory, also known as “Terministic Screens,” is a concept developed by Burke in his work “Language as Symbolic Action” (1966). In this theory, Burke argues that language acts as a filter or screen through which we perceive and understand the world. This concept is central to Burke’s broader theory of dramatism, which posits that human behavior is shaped by dramatic structures and symbolic action.
Key Principles of Screen Theory:
-
Language as a Filter:
Burke’s concept of language as a filter is a fundamental aspect of his Screen Theory. According to Burke, language is not a neutral or transparent medium, but rather a filter that shapes our perceptions and understanding of reality. Our words, concepts, and categories act as a screen, selecting and organizing the information we receive from the world. This means that language is not simply a reflection of reality, but rather a creative force that shapes our understanding of the world and ourselves. As Burke (1966) notes, “even if any given terminology is a reflection of reality, by its very nature as a terminology it must be a selection of reality; and to this extent it must function also as a deflection of reality” (p. 45).
The idea that language is a filter has significant implications for our understanding of perception and reality. It suggests that our understanding of the world is always mediated by language, and that we can never directly access reality. This is because language is a system of signs and symbols that can never fully capture the complexity of the world. As a result, our perceptions and understanding of reality are always filtered through the linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to make sense of the world. This highlights the importance of critically evaluating the language and concepts that we use to describe reality, as they can shape our perceptions and understanding in profound ways.
-
Terministic Screens:
Burke introduces the term “terministic screens” to describe the way language influences our perception. Terministic screens refer to the linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to make sense of the world. These screens are composed of terms, concepts, and categories that filter and shape our experience. Terministic screens are not just passive reflections of reality, but rather active forces that shape our understanding of the world and ourselves. As Burke (1945) notes, “the terms we use to describe the world are not just labels, but also instruments for shaping our understanding of the world” (p. 123).
The concept of terministic screens is closely tied to the idea of language as a filter. Terministic screens are the specific linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to filter and shape our experience of the world. They are the tools that we use to make sense of reality, and they play a crucial role in shaping our perceptions and understanding. By examining the terministic screens that we use, we can gain a deeper understanding of how language influences our perception and understanding of the world.
-
Selection and Deflection:
Burke argues that language selects certain aspects of reality to focus on, while deflecting or ignoring others. This selective process is inherent in the nature of language, which can never fully capture the complexity of the world. Language is a system of signs and symbols that can only represent a limited aspect of reality. As a result, language must always select certain aspects of reality to focus on, while ignoring or deflecting others. This selective process is not just a limitation of language, but also a fundamental aspect of how language works.
The concept of selection and deflection is closely tied to the idea of terministic screens. Terministic screens are the specific linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to filter and shape our experience of the world. They select certain aspects of reality to focus on, while deflecting or ignoring others. By examining the terministic screens that we use, we can gain a deeper understanding of how language selects and deflects certain aspects of reality. This can help us to critically evaluate the language and concepts that we use to describe reality, and to develop a more nuanced understanding of the world.
-
Reflection and Refraction:
Burke uses the metaphor of reflection and refraction to describe how language affects our understanding. Language reflects certain aspects of reality, but also refracts or distorts others, creating a unique and subjective interpretation of the world. This metaphor highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of language, which can both reflect and distort reality. As Burke (1966) notes, “language is not just a reflection of reality, but also a refraction of reality” (p. 56).
The concept of reflection and refraction is closely tied to the idea of terministic screens. Terministic screens are the specific linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to filter and shape our experience of the world. They reflect certain aspects of reality, but also refract or distort others, creating a unique and subjective interpretation of the world. By examining the terministic screens that we use, we can gain a deeper understanding of how language reflects and refracts reality. This can help us to develop a more nuanced understanding of the world, and to critically evaluate the language and concepts that we use to describe reality.
Implications of Screen Theory:
- Subjectivity of Perception:
Burke’s Screen Theory highlights the subjective nature of perception, emphasizing that our understanding of the world is always filtered through language and conceptual frameworks. This means that our perceptions and understanding of reality are always shaped by the linguistic and conceptual frameworks that we use to make sense of the world.
- Limitations of Language:
The theory underscores the limitations of language in capturing the full complexity of reality, revealing the provisional and context-dependent nature of our knowledge. Language is a system of signs and symbols that can never fully capture the complexity of the world. As a result, our understanding of reality is always limited by the language and concepts that we use to describe it.
- Power Dynamics:
Screen Theory also implies that language can be used to shape and manipulate perceptions, highlighting the role of power and ideology in shaping our understanding of the world. Language is not just a neutral or transparent medium, but rather a tool that can be used to shape and manipulate perceptions. This highlights the importance of critically evaluating the language and concepts that we use to describe reality, as they can shape our perceptions and understanding in profound ways.
- Rhetorical Implications:
Burke’s theory has significant implications for rhetoric, as it emphasizes the importance of considering the terministic screens that shape our audience’s perceptions and understanding. By examining the terministic screens that our audience uses, we can develop a more effective and persuasive rhetoric that takes into account the subjective nature of perception.
Applications and Critiques:
- Communication Studies: Screen Theory has been applied in communication studies to analyze how language and media shape public opinion and influence attitudes. By examining the terministic screens that are used in public discourse, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how language shapes our perceptions and understanding of the world.
- Literary Theory: The theory has been used in literary analysis to examine how authors use language to create specific effects and shape reader perceptions. By examining the terministic screens that authors use, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how language shapes our understanding of the world and ourselves.
- Philosophy: Burke’s ideas have been influential in philosophical debates about the nature of language, reality, and knowledge. By examining the terministic screens that we use to describe reality, philosophers can gain a deeper understanding of the complex relationships between language, perception, and reality.
- Critiques: Some critics have argued that Burke’s theory is too broad or vague, while others have challenged the idea that language is the primary filter through which we perceive reality. However, these critiques overlook the complexity and nuance of Burke’s theory, which highlights the multifaceted nature of language and its role in shaping our perceptions and understanding of the world.
Conclusion:
Kenneth Burke’s Screen Theory offers a nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between language, perception, and reality. By highlighting the role of terministic screens in shaping our understanding, Burke’s theory encourages us to consider the provisional and context-dependent nature of our knowledge. The implications of Screen Theory are far-reaching, influencing fields such as communication studies, literary theory, and philosophy, and continuing to inspire new areas of research and inquiry.